Well, small-unit tactics and individual tactics have to differ, somehow, Glorious General!
I've been thinking more and more about introducing two combat systems in my homebrew: one for "social fights", which aim to establish dominance - and one for "hunting fights", which aim to kill or disable with minimum risk.What I really want is something to show the sharp deliniation between the tournament or dueling field and the battlefield; from a situation where some notion of honor and propriety holds as opposed to "kickin' and gougin' in the mud and the blood and the beer."
I'm not there yet, but it's hard to resist the temptation...
And that, Glorious General, is the difference between the two in a nutshell: duelling versus masacre. Even when both are done with swords, the difference in the underlying psychology makes even the technique different.Or to quote Lois McMaster Bujold's Curse of Chalion, “I don’t duel, boy. I kill as a soldier kills, which is as a butcher kills, as quickly, efficiently, and with as least risk to myself as I can arrange.”
(Chirine, you have GOT to read that)
And Tekumel, I'm happy to say, worked that way. Korunme engaged with a fencing master to learn arruche, the art of two weapon fighting, and practiced diligently to become quite good at it. But when the trumpets sounded and the battle began, it was "kill the other sons of bitches in the most expedient manner possible before they kill you."
I've been re-reading old French crime stories, classical legends and early pulp books lately. Luckily, other countries' authors aren't infected with the Extreme Correctness Syndrome, either.
H.R.Haggard didn't know what "political correctness" is; his protagonists, however, often behave more like what I'd term "decent human beings" than some propponents of said concept.
All I can do is shrug. Stupidity also comes and goes in waves. Sooner or later, this one, too, shall pass.
Bookmarks