Indeed there is...
"The royalties are killing us" - Germans in WWI.Good point! I can also think of the time Krupp was selling artillery to the Imperial Chinese, only to have the guns used on the German gunboats. Or Vickers paying Krupp royalties throughout the First World War for the use of the Krupp 'Patent Shell Fuse' on the rounds being fired at the Germans...
And that's why I suspect they might have received a slightly different deal including more direction...I think that this is very true. We were very, very integrated into the setting, while the other groups were quite up-front about not being all that integrated / involved in the setting.
Then it should help either way.I think it will. I'll have a lot more time for writing, as well as actually getting out of the house and seeing people. I have great hopes for stress reduction, as well!
The notion is why I refused for a long time to have anything to do with D&D...'Niche protection'? 'Lack of'? I'm frankly astonished by the notion.
Obviously that's not how some people want it, though.Everybody played, and everybody got to do things.
Yeah - I don't think I'm lying, either. But according to the guy, by constructing custom stats for the opponents (in a game where each enemy combatant has his, her or its unique skills), I'm lying to the players...'Lying to your players'? Not here, thank you. Didn't play like that, don't play like that, won't play like that.
Yes, I called BS already, according to my own advice.
Oh yes, I'm sure there's a long and illustrious tradition! The first time I got acquainted with it, I was 7 - when I read "The Good Soldier Švejk"...they mentioned court martial there. And there was even a mention of "that officer was a bastard, so of course he got shot in the first battle - some of the holes were in his back, reportedly"...All very appropriate, I think. Like the medieval English army commander who simply pole-axed one of his subordinates for not doing anything during a battle.
I'd call that "a court martial from your social inferiors".
A death of thousand cuts, then. Fits with OAL.Nope; the OAL hunted hiom down, out in the Tsolei Islands where he'd fled to, and wrapped him in wet Vraoz fibers and let him dry out. The stuff is as strong as steel wire, and shrinks as it dries...
Didn't they confiscate the Eye and apply it again?
"A few games" is longer than such people tend to last.Yes, but usually it didn't come to that; after a few games, nobody would play with or run games with them, and they'd eventually get the message and drift off.
One of my favourite GMs was fond of telling the story of such a player. Said player decided to go with a shirt and epee to war. Then, while sneaking around looking for recon, hidden in a swamp, he noticed a man in good, expensive armour and with a glaive. Said character had met some guy they didn't know, either. The two exchanged some words, and the guy with the glaive killed the other, seemingly in vengeance.
What did the PC decide? Why, of course, he jumped up, pulled his epee, and charged. While in waist-deep water.
They guy met him head on while he was still in knee-deep water, unarmoured and with no shield. You can guess what happened exactly two swings of the glaive later; it's not like the unarmoured guy should have counted on his mobility to even stand a chance, not at all...
The player had the gall to complain that "it's too easy to die in that system" (which they were playtesting). One of the other players looked at him and replied "the system's fine, it's you who's the moron".
Well, it seems some people think only brute strength matters. It's a way of thinking, I guess.I'm still boggled by this; we always thought and fought tactically, as it just seemed like a useful survival mechanism. Arneson was what was called a 'killer referee', and Phil's Tekumel was just plain deadly.
...I'm afraid I must agree with Dave Arneson. He can decide whether to accept what has happened in their games or not. But "losing control"? That's impossible.
FLGS, mostly?
(Actually, I'm afraid they're everywhere).
It's a Bethorm module.
Surrounded and outnumbered by light cavalry in a field?
I think these guys would need their roleplaying skills for negotiating a surrender.
As for your Modesty Blaise advantage, you mean this Modesty Blaise right?
I'd consider signing for those courses.
Now that would be just cruel!
Bookmarks