Agreed; I suspect that a big issue was that some of the artists in his game groups were skilled technically then he was, and let him know that on a regular basis. Katy, Ken, and Chris never, ever did that, which is why _ I think - he tended to listed to them and cooperate with them more and more.
Agreed. I wish you could see the rest of the material I have on file from him in the 1948 - 1952 period. What we know today of Tekumel was very largely created back then, and the details filled in in the 1970s. The 'Ts Rani' language and script documents have survived 99% intact in the later tw0-book set, with additional materials, and the 'History Of The Ts Rani Empire' is the foundation of "Deeds"; the first section of the latter book is almost entirely the 1950s manuscript. When I compared the two texts, I realized just how Dave Arneson and Gary Gygax must have felt when they saw Phil's work for the first time.
I looked that reference up, having only seen a copy of the game on the shelf in the FLGS, but I'd say that you are right. I do wish other people would read it, as they might realize just what I really am.
Yes; I always think in strategic terms, as all too many opponents in all sorts of games have learned. I think in long-term goals and objectives, not in short-term tactical ones. And it's always been a great help to me that quite a few of my opponents over the decades have been so predictable, and can be counted on to not to think but to 'shot from the hip'. It makes them so much easier to manipulate, especially as so many of them don't stop and think what my goals and objectives might be, or what might be their - and my - optimal outcomes.
I will freely admit that this does annoy some people, when I decline combat at that point in time; I can remember one huge "Chainmail" game that Gronan ran where I opened the battle by retreating, at which my opponents called me a coward and other, nastier, things. They pressed their attack, and then discovered that I had conducted a fighting withdrawal into a superb defensive position, and being gamers quite willingly stuffed their larger army into my troops' meat grinder. They had 10-1 odds on me, and lost 10 to 1 casualties. I laughed a lot over that one...
I happen to prefer offensive defensive battles, if I can use that phrase, as it never seem to occur to people - aside from Gronan, who knows better! - that I might find it very much to my advantage to allow myself to be attacked...
Agincourt. Crecy. Poitiers. Waterloo. Gettysburg. Sedan. Omdurman. To name a few. I am that most dangerous of all foes, a historian with a good memory - the the wit to use it...
Bookmarks